There is no occasion to doubt the decision-making process in the procurement of 36 Rafale jets from France, the Supreme Court said on Friday and dismissed all the petitions seeking an investigation into alleged irregularities in the Rs 58,000 crore deal.
New Delhi: Bharatiya Janta Party ally Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut on Friday commented on Supreme Court verdict on Rafale deal and said that Rafale Deal issue will be sorted out in the parliament and not in SC. Speaking after the court verdict, Raut said “Supreme court said nothing wrong, deciding on pricing is not the Supreme Court's job but similarly deciding on building Ram Temple is also not their job”.
Even Congress leader Randeep Surjewala said that deciding on Rafale isn’t Supreme Court’s business and demanded a Joint Parliamentary Committee probe on the same.
Even Congress leader Randeep Surjewala said that deciding on Rafale isn’t Supreme Court’s business and demanded a Joint Parliamentary Committee probe on the same.
सुरजा जिसका कोई भी अपना नहीं है पुर्जा ,और इनके आका और उनकी अम्मा न सुप्रीम कोर्ट की मानते हैं ,न चुनाव आयोग की ,न चुनावी ईवीएम्स की ,संसद में ये हुल्लड़ करेंगे ,ये हुल्लड़ी चीन की मानते हैं ,आईएसआई की मानते हैं इसीलिए राहु -राजनीति के चीन आते जाते रहते हैं पाकिस्तान अपने आदमी भेजते रहतें हैं। इनका विरोध मोदी से उतना नहीं है जितना इस देश की संविधानिक संस्थाओं से है जिनके साथ छेड़खानी की शुरुआत इनकी दादी ने १९७५ में ही कर दी थी।
भारत धर्मी समाज को इन विखंडनवादी मवालियों की शिनाख्त कर लेनी चाहिए। २०१९ में इनका तरपण मतदान के ज़रिये करने की जरुरत है।
'झूठा गैंग' के सरदार और उनके खड़गे झूठ बोलते हैं झूठ के सिवाय और कुछ नहीं। कोर्ट में क्यों नहीं जाते कोर्ट से मांगे उस रिपोर्ट की कॉपी जिसपे हायतौबा मचा रखी है।वरना समझा जाएगा इन्होने डिब्बे का ही दूध पीया है सबने।
There is no occasion to doubt the decision-making process in the procurement of 36 Rafale jets from France, the Supreme Court said on Friday and dismissed all the petitions seeking an investigation into alleged irregularities in the Rs 58,000 crore deal.
There was no substantial evidence of commercial favouritism to any private entity, the bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said on the issue of an offset partner in its ruling on a batch of petitions.
While one lot sought a court-monitored investigation into the deal, another asked for a direction to the CBI to register an FIR for alleged irregularities.
There is no occasion to doubt the decision-making process in the procurement of 36 Rafale jets from France, the Supreme Court said on Friday and dismissed all the petitions seeking an investigation into alleged irregularities in the Rs 58,000 crore deal.
There was no substantial evidence of commercial favouritism to any private entity, the bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said on the issue of an offset partner in its ruling on a batch of petitions.
While one lot sought a court-monitored investigation into the deal, another asked for a direction to the CBI to register an FIR for alleged irregularities.
There has been a necessity for fighter aircraft and the country cannot remain without jets, it said.
The CJI, who read out the judgement for the three-judge bench, said no reasons were found to interfere in the procurement process for the fighter jets.
The apex court said it does not find substantial matter to interfere with the issue of procurement, pricing and offset partner.
It noted the need for induction of 4th and 5th generation of fighter aircraft like Rafale in the Indian Air Force (IAF).
Comments
Post a Comment